A wholly realized novel of five friends who meet at a summer arts camp, and then spend the rest of their lives intertwined with one another through decades of marriage, friendship, illness, and socio-economic differences. 
Meg Wolitzer likes to touch on the cultural sociology of a time period, from women’s lib in the 1970’s through to the AIDS crisis in the 80’s and 90’s. She has done this in previous novels, by peppering her characters lives with the background noise of Vietnam, career priorities, marriages unfolding, and the advent of various technologies and innovations that change our lives. 
Her curiosity for how other people might feel about a situation, a conflict, a set of circumstances is relevant to the way she draws her characters into nuanced, layered composites, as in the case of Ethan, the Jiminy Cricket conscious of the group, morally sound, infinitely talented, who can’t figure out how to love his own son. And Jules, consistently feeling short of her own expectations for success, despite having built a family, and an accomplished mental health practice. 
What’s interesting about The Interestings is that it captures the regularity of life’s progression in an absorbing, whole-hearted way. With love, envy, searching and regret all playing equal parts.

A wholly realized novel of five friends who meet at a summer arts camp, and then spend the rest of their lives intertwined with one another through decades of marriage, friendship, illness, and socio-economic differences. 

Meg Wolitzer likes to touch on the cultural sociology of a time period, from women’s lib in the 1970’s through to the AIDS crisis in the 80’s and 90’s. She has done this in previous novels, by peppering her characters lives with the background noise of Vietnam, career priorities, marriages unfolding, and the advent of various technologies and innovations that change our lives.

Her curiosity for how other people might feel about a situation, a conflict, a set of circumstances is relevant to the way she draws her characters into nuanced, layered composites, as in the case of Ethan, the Jiminy Cricket conscious of the group, morally sound, infinitely talented, who can’t figure out how to love his own son. And Jules, consistently feeling short of her own expectations for success, despite having built a family, and an accomplished mental health practice.

What’s interesting about The Interestings is that it captures the regularity of life’s progression in an absorbing, whole-hearted way. With love, envy, searching and regret all playing equal parts.

The North Coast of Rhodes and the neo-classical harbor of Symi, Greece

Lindos, the ancient village of Rhodes

Lindos, the ancient village of Rhodes

Flowers in bloom in the Dodecanese

Flowers in bloom in the Dodecanese

Catching up on Tin House

One of the best comedic casts on television. 

Zoey: Nights are different.
 Jackie: Yes. More stab wounds, more drunks, less nutjobs, less children. Okay, you prioritize by condition. Gunshots, stabbings, cardiac arrest followed by bleeders and shallow breathers.
 Zoey: Shallow breathers. Got it. What about someone who can’t breath at all. Jackie: They are already dead. They go to the waiting room.

One of the best comedic casts on television.

Zoey: Nights are different.


Jackie: Yes. More stab wounds, more drunks, less nutjobs, less children. Okay, you prioritize by condition. Gunshots, stabbings, cardiac arrest followed by bleeders and shallow breathers.


Zoey: Shallow breathers. Got it. What about someone who can’t breath at all.
Jackie: They are already dead. They go to the waiting room.

View of Traben Trarbach from the remains of Grevenburg Castle…

View of Traben Trarbach from the remains of Grevenburg Castle…

Eugene Jarecki, of Why We Fight, brings together the Wire creator, David Simon, criminal justice professors at Harvard and Columbia, a somewhat remorseful judge, drug cops, and a number of convicted drug dealers, addicts and petty criminals in one of the best documentaries since Inside Job. Inspired by the life of his childhood nanny, and her children’s spiral into drugs, Jarecki looks at issues of class that divide us into seriously segmented groups. The underprivileged, under-achieving, misguided versus the well-adjusted, life of opportunities upwardly mobile.
Jarecki provides more than a rich history of the “drug wars” in America from the 1960’s through the present day, offering a look at the public and political reaction to each new drug to hit the streets from marijuana to crystal meth. He asks tough questions, but more importantly, he looks at the demographics of people who are most likely to end up in the system to live out their lives of mind numbing routine and excruciating isolation from behind bars.
There are two vital elements that serve as the undercurrent to his work.
First, is the corruption of cops in a system that provides financial reward for number of drugs arrests. Instead of cracking murder cases, hard crime, and robberies, cops have an incentive to bust petty dealers in a hook ‘em and book ‘em routine. This has led to years of a perpetuating cycle where cops look for someone to bust for a cash reward. In one case, a new cop car was financed directly with recovered drug money in Texas. 
The second issue is more nuanced and personal. While Nanny was taking care of young Eugene in New York, her own children, left behind in new Haven, Connecticut, suffered without a mother. Torn between providing for them, and being with them, Nanny went to New York to make more money and spend her days raising privileged white children instead of her own. This is an issue that plagues the playgrounds of Central Park, Hyde Park, and other wealthy regions of the world where both immigrant mothers and the working poor spend all day with someone else’s child, while in some form neglecting their own. Being a nanny is not a 9-5 gig. You arrive before the parents leave in the morning, and you leave after they return. You are expected to do the things you cannot do for your own children for the one’s you’re getting paid to care for. This is a choice made by both sides, and a complex issue from either angle. But either way, its a problem.
The House I Live In has characters whose lives and motivations you want to know more about. It presents the criminally convicted in a way that you hope for them, (mostly) only the best. Jarecki’s emotion for storytelling and justice shine through in the most controlled, and loyal way, and hopefully he’ll be a name in documentary film making long into the future. 

Eugene Jarecki, of Why We Fight, brings together the Wire creator, David Simon, criminal justice professors at Harvard and Columbia, a somewhat remorseful judge, drug cops, and a number of convicted drug dealers, addicts and petty criminals in one of the best documentaries since Inside Job. Inspired by the life of his childhood nanny, and her children’s spiral into drugs, Jarecki looks at issues of class that divide us into seriously segmented groups. The underprivileged, under-achieving, misguided versus the well-adjusted, life of opportunities upwardly mobile.

Jarecki provides more than a rich history of the “drug wars” in America from the 1960’s through the present day, offering a look at the public and political reaction to each new drug to hit the streets from marijuana to crystal meth. He asks tough questions, but more importantly, he looks at the demographics of people who are most likely to end up in the system to live out their lives of mind numbing routine and excruciating isolation from behind bars.

There are two vital elements that serve as the undercurrent to his work.

First, is the corruption of cops in a system that provides financial reward for number of drugs arrests. Instead of cracking murder cases, hard crime, and robberies, cops have an incentive to bust petty dealers in a hook ‘em and book ‘em routine. This has led to years of a perpetuating cycle where cops look for someone to bust for a cash reward. In one case, a new cop car was financed directly with recovered drug money in Texas. 

The second issue is more nuanced and personal. While Nanny was taking care of young Eugene in New York, her own children, left behind in new Haven, Connecticut, suffered without a mother. Torn between providing for them, and being with them, Nanny went to New York to make more money and spend her days raising privileged white children instead of her own. This is an issue that plagues the playgrounds of Central Park, Hyde Park, and other wealthy regions of the world where both immigrant mothers and the working poor spend all day with someone else’s child, while in some form neglecting their own. Being a nanny is not a 9-5 gig. You arrive before the parents leave in the morning, and you leave after they return. You are expected to do the things you cannot do for your own children for the one’s you’re getting paid to care for. This is a choice made by both sides, and a complex issue from either angle. But either way, its a problem.

The House I Live In has characters whose lives and motivations you want to know more about. It presents the criminally convicted in a way that you hope for them, (mostly) only the best. Jarecki’s emotion for storytelling and justice shine through in the most controlled, and loyal way, and hopefully he’ll be a name in documentary film making long into the future. 

nypl:

The New York Public Library is facing a $47 million city budget cut that would force cutbacks to key free services that the public relies on, such as programs, classes, library hours, and more. We need your help to stop these cuts! Go to nypl.org/speakout to sign a letter and tell the City that you and your communities need your library (it only takes a few minutes, and you don’t need to live in NYC)! Spread the word, support NYPL, keep libraries strong, and thank you! 

nypl:

The New York Public Library is facing a $47 million city budget cut that would force cutbacks to key free services that the public relies on, such as programs, classes, library hours, and more. We need your help to stop these cuts! Go to nypl.org/speakout to sign a letter and tell the City that you and your communities need your library (it only takes a few minutes, and you don’t need to live in NYC)! Spread the word, support NYPL, keep libraries strong, and thank you! 

simena:

Eugen Spiro 

simena:

Eugen Spiro 

(via booklover)

Exquisite Amoveo. Choreographed by Benjamin Millepied

Performed by Aurelie Dupont and Nicholas Leriche

Weekly Reading

Non-fiction, fiction, and The Unchangeable Spots of non-fictional fiction. Or fictional non-fiction. Which is it?

Researcher Brene Brown’s Ted Talk on her decade of research into why some of us feel worthy and some of us feel unworthy. And that instead of declaring a new baby “perfect,” a better, and more authentic bet would be to celebrate its human imperfection.

A very clever visual typography that personifies the neighborhoods of Paris.

Spring has sprung.

Spring has sprung.

Tags: France

Paperblog Pin It